From the Missouri Viewpoints Archives:

Publication date: June 16 2013

Common Core: Uplifting or Usurping Local Control of Education?

Common Core: Uplifting or Usurping Local Control of Education?

(St. Charles, MO) – Public education in Missouri, and throughout America, need to adapt to the constant change of technology and global competition.

Almost everyone agrees on that.

Opposition is growing to the approach many Missouri officials want to implement within our education system. It’s called Common Core standards and, depending on whom you ask, it’s either a common sense approach to delivering a better education to more children or it’s a scheme to centralize education decisions and interfere with both local control and parental involvement.

According to the website of the national coalition pushing the idea, Common Core standards “…provide a consistent, clear understanding of what students are expected to learn, so teachers and parents know what they need to do to help them.” That national coalition includes the National Governors Association.

Right now, the standards are designed in math and English. Missouri education officials signed on to them in 2010 but the backlash is growing as the implementation is now in progress.

Proponents say the approach allows schools to focus on a more narrow set of subjects and skills, including critical thinking and problem solving, which will increase academic performance across the board. Critics say that contributes to an erosion of local control of education even though there is no specific Common Core curriculum.

They say the federal government is pushing adoption of Common Core through funding incentives and programs like “Race To The Top.”

A group called Missouri Coalition Against Common Core calls it a “…thinly veiled initiative, funded by special interests and the federal government, designed to circumvent the prohibition against the development of national education standards.”

The group says the decision by the state’s Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to join 44 other states regarding Common Core, has “…signed away local control of education to outside entities.”

On “Missouri Viewpoints”, the Missouri National Education Association’s Ann Jarrett says the standards are designed to move children through the K-12 system in a way that better prepares them for what’s on the other side of graduation. “When they graduate from high school they are globally competitive, they are ready for basic college entry or for entry into careers – technical fields.”

The Missouri NEA does not have a formal position for or against Common Core standards but Jarrett says that since the state’s Department of Elementary and Secondary Education signed on to the effort in 2010, the discussion at this point should be about how to implement it.

Part of the changes to teaching math through Common Core, according to Jarrett, include “…introducing concepts, not particular methods of solving problems, but concepts earlier. And more of a focus on how do you get to those [and] understanding those concepts deeply.”

She calls that a change from the current approach that has been referred to as “curriculums now are an inch deep and a mile wide.”

How local schools get to that goal of teaching the subject concepts, supporters say, is up to them and is not controlled by any national organization.

Dr. James Shuls is an education policy analyst for the Show Me Institute. He questions many things about Common Core including the basic premise behind it.

“If you look at all the other countries of the world, the countries that perform above us, many of them do have national standards. But so do the ones that perform below us and there’s not really any evidence that national standards will improve education outcomes.”

Shuls wants the state to consider what could be called an opposite approach; instead of centralized and top-down, one that centers around the most local of education patrons – the student’s families.

“In my mind, a much better idea is giving parents more autonomy, more ability to choose their child’s school. Through school choice, they’re going to demand rigorous standards from their school. They’re going to demand that the school does a great job educating their children and through school choice, allowing schools to customize and meet the needs of students.”

Missouri’s education policy is going in the other direction and toward implementation of Common Core standards at this point. For that reason, Shuls says it’s even more important now that parents get involved in their local school districts and question every change that’s being made in the classroom.

On the web:

Common Core State Standards Initiative:

Missouri National Education Association:

Show Me Institute: